Minnesota Vikings fans should be looking very closely at the quarterback controversy in San Francisco.
It seems all but certain now that head
coach Jim Harbaugh's choice for the future is second-year player
Colin Kaepernick. Incumbent Alex Smith's concussion gave Harbaugh the
opportunity to start Kaepernick, who's 2-0 in two starts.
What does this mean for longtime 49er
and #1 overall pick Alex Smith? He signed a three-year contract
earlier this season, but if the 49ers like Kaepernick going forward,
it seems unlikely that they would want to keep Smith around, both
with his salary and with his likely rancor at being passed over while
not doing anything wrong on the football field. This being the NFL, it's tough to tell
exactly how much money is guaranteed, but here's what I found on
Smith's contract:
Signed a three-year, $24 million
contract. The deal contains $9 million guaranteed -- an initial
roster bonus of $3 million, all of Smith's 2012 base salary, and $1
million of his 2013 salary. Another $9 million is available through
incentives, though $5.25 million of them are "unlikely to be
earned." An annual $250,000 workout bonus is available. 2012: $5
million, 2013: $7.5 million (+ $1 million roster bonus due in March),
2014: $7.5 million, 2015: Free Agent
So it looks as if Smith would be set to
earn $16 million in 2013-14, though it also says only $9 million –
Smith's 2012 salary of $5 million, a roster bonus of $3 million, and $1 million of his
2013 salary – is guaranteed. Even at a full $16 million over two
years, that's not bad for a starting-caliber quarterback, and
depending on the exact wording of his contract, Smith might come
cheaper.
And that could be just what the
Minnesota Vikings need.
Now, I'm not going to try and sell
Vikings fans on the “all we need is a quarterback” bandwagon
that's led to us trotting out quick fixes for years, like Brad
Johnson, Brett Favre, Donovan McNabb, and the like. But effective quarterbacking is still
important, and it's hard to believe at this point that Christian
Ponder is the answer. At the very least, the Vikings need a capable
alternative in 2013. Joe Webb is unlikely, the team isn't likely to
draft high enough (and this year's QB class is considered rather
weak), and there isn't expected to be a significant free agent
available. Smith might be the most capable QB available, especially
if Kaepernick secures the starting job.
But is he worth it? Smith was a bad QB
for a while and is still considered a bust as a #1 overall pick,
especially with Aaron Rodgers being drafted later in the first round
in 2005. But he's re-invented himself over the last two years as a
solid QB who doesn't make mistakes, which is exactly what a team with
a strong running game and defense, like the 49ers, needs.
Over the last two years, on 662 pass
attempts – a little more than one season for most guys, but a
season and a half for the run-focused 49ers – Smith has 30
touchdowns and only 10 interceptions and a 95.1 passer rating. And I
don't think it's a complete fluke; even in 2009-10, he had 32 TDs and
22 picks, which isn't exceptional but is a far cry from his previous
seasons.
The one blemish on his stats is his
sack rate, which has ballooned from 7.8% from 2005-10 to 9.3% in
2011-12. But maybe that comes with throwing fewer interceptions.
Maybe Smith is taking more sacks instead of throwing the ball up for
grabs and having it get picked off. Neither is great, but I'd rather
take the sacks.
Finally, unlike most of our short-term
QB fixes in the past, Smith is still young. He'll turn 29 next May and could
theoretically have a lot of football left in him. The 49ers realize
this, of course, and will demand high trade value for him, but I
think he'd be at least worth a second-round pick.
Would Smith's style fit with the
Vikings? The team's running game is comparable to/better than the
49ers', though the 49ers clearly have the better defense. And maybe
Jim Harbaugh is just a really good coach, and Smith wouldn't do as
well with another guy calling the shots.
But he's likely to be the best
quarterback available in 2013, and the Vikings can't go into next
season with Christian Ponder and expect success. Something has to be
done, and this might be it.
very intriguing... i think bringing him in and just have a flat out qb competetion would be optimal..giving CP another year to prove things.. but in AS would be willing to come in to this environemnt.. i think coudn't hurt.. cap room not withstanding.
ReplyDeleteAnon 11:45 a.m.:
DeleteI'm not in favor of bringing in Smith. Give Ponder a WR or two besides Harvin who can get open and then let's see what we have. Bringing in Smith to compete with Ponder would be a circus in 2013, and I don't think he could be anymore successful than Ponder in his third year without that SF defense backing him up. I also don't think Spielman would want to give up a high draft choice for Smith after drafting Ponder #12 overall in 2011. Just my two cents, though.
I'm with you, DC. If Alex Smith is the best quarterback out there, I'd rather give Ponder more time. I'm not sold on Ponder as a long-term solution, but that possibility remains. It doesn't with Smith.
DeleteI'm a week or so late with this but I don't see the advantage of giving Ponder more time. I went into this season very tepidly. Ponder in his second season, Harvin disgruntled and in a contract year, a defense that was going to be mediocre at best outside of Jared Allen, and Peterson coming back from a major injury.
DeleteThen the season started and the wins started coming. Harvin was being used in every facet of the offense and getting to show that he is, in all likelyhood,the most versatile offensive weapon in the NFL. The defense wasn't great but they were certainly above average. And Adrian Peterson is on pace to have the best season of his career (think about all that entails both in the context of the past 12 months and his entire career).
Even before the Harvin injury, Ponder was regressing. Since the Harvin injury, Ponder literally looks like he's playing quarterback for the first time every week.
QBs do take time to develop but how can the Vikings organization and Vikings fanbase justify being patient with Ponder while Peterson is in his prime and, given his age, probably only has three or four more elite seasons in him?
How does the organization justify being patient with Ponder and giving it another year of evaluation while Peterson shows why he's the best back if the past decade in a wasted season and while Harvin remains unsigned long-term? How do you justify it when a guy like Jared Allen is nearing the backside of his career?
I'm usually in the "think long-term" crowd but the window is closing a lot sooner than most of us think on the elite Peterson, Harvin, and Allen core.
I meant before a contract year in the case of Harvin...
DeleteCJac:
DeleteI fell off the Ponder bandwagon last week after his two picks and general inability to complete a forward cost the Vikings a huge upset win at Lambeau. It's hard to envision – even with an improved WR corps – how someone can look that bad and be a franchise QB someday. Back to the drawing board at QB for the Vikings this offseason, I think. Management might have other ideas, though.
I could be convinced that Smith might be a good fit. Especially if the last few games make it clear that Ponder is not going to be at least average any time soon. Smith is definitely the best option if the Vikes decide they need a new QB next year, and would be better than any QB we could find in the 2nd round of the draft (if that is indeed the asking price).
ReplyDeleteBecause the QB position is so hard to fill, I am all for finding solutions like Alex Smith. If a team keeps thinking it MUST develop a drafted QB, it might just be back every 2-4 years trying to do it again. You have to try get competent quarterbacking where you can.
ReplyDeleteAnd at the very least, even if the Vikes name Ponder the 2013 starter right now, they have to have a ready, quality backup in place for if he fails, otherwise 2013 will be a lost season no matter what else happens.
I'll continue to delude myself that Dallas will tire of Tony Romo, whom I think is better than most people think, making him available.
PV:
DeleteWeren't you advocating for the Vikings to free Joe Webb a few weeks back? So is he not a quality backup? Or were you just asking to bring in Webb because he's the best, most experienced QB the Vikings have who is behind Ponder?
The Vikings wouldn't have to give up much if they were interested. From everything I've read the 49ers have no leverage to get anything in a trade, everyone knows they have to cut him. There's no way he would stay as a backup or restructure his contract. He wants out and they won't pay him that roster bonus in March 2013, he will be with a new team next year. He may want a better situation than competing with a high draft pick in MN though. Someone else will probably give him a starting job, right? If they can't get Smith, you're stuck with a Chad Henne, Matt Moore, Kevin Kolb? Romo would be nice but can't see that. What about Matt Flynn in Seattle, he should be available too. Not much out there at that position. Ponder may or may not be the answer, but we definitely need a quality backup to give him some competition next year.
ReplyDeleteJoe Webb MUST be terrible if he has to back up Ponder. No way he should have thrown the ball across his body.
ReplyDeleteMay have to reconsider my "stay with Ponder" position after today's loss. Even mediocre QB play would have won this for the Vikings, I think.
ReplyDelete